Under the current administration of President Donald Trump, the use of the 287(g) program, which allows local law enforcement to enforce immigration law, has expanded dramatically. This initiative represents a significant shift in the U.S. immigration strategy as it empowers state and local police to act as federal immigration agents.
Rapid Expansion of the 287(g) Program
The 287(g) program, originally established under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, had seen limited use in previous administrations. However, as of February 2025, the number of active agreements has surged to 1,412, with over 1,130 signed within the current year alone. This is a stark contrast to the mere 45 agreements signed during 2019, indicating a substantial uptick in local law enforcement’s involvement in immigration enforcement under Trump’s second term.
On his first day in office, President Trump signed an executive order titled “Protecting the American People from Invasion,” which directed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to maximize these agreements. This directive marked a strategic pivot, emphasizing a more aggressive stance on immigration control compared to previous years.
Mechanisms of the 287(g) Program
The 287(g) program operates through three primary models:
-
The Jail Enforcement Model: Individuals entering local jails are checked for legal status. If they are undocumented, the local law enforcement notifies ICE for potential deportation.
-
The Warrant Service Officer Model: Local police officers are trained to serve immigration warrants within their jurisdictions.
-
The Task Force Model: Officers are empowered to stop and question individuals regarding immigration status and can make arrests for civil immigration violations.
This layered approach allows local police to engage in immigration enforcement while working in collaboration with federal authorities, making the local police departments key players in the immigration enforcement landscape.
Evaluating Effectiveness and Concerns
Proponents of the 287(g) program argue that it helps to target criminal illegal aliens and increases public safety. In Florida, for instance, local law enforcement has reportedly made significant arrests, with Gov. Ron DeSantis actively encouraging local agencies to enter into agreements with ICE, resulting in approximately 40,000 arrests.
Nonetheless, the program has faced criticism regarding its effectiveness and potential for civil rights violations. Critics highlight that it often leads to racial profiling and other civil rights abuses, particularly as local police can become entangled in complex immigration laws without sufficient training. This is compounded by instances where U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents have been wrongly detained during immigration sweeps.
Annie Lai, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, notes the heightened risk for civil rights violations associated with the program. Past experiences with law enforcement partnerships, particularly under the sheriff’s office in Maricopa County, Arizona, have raised significant legal and societal concerns.
Legislative Pushback and Future Implications
In response to the program’s expansion, some states are taking steps to withdraw from participation in 287(g) agreements. For instance, Virginia’s Governor Abigail Spanberger recently issued an executive order to terminate existing agreements within the state, while legislation in Maryland aims to prevent new agreements and phase out current partnerships.
Amidst this evolving landscape, the Trump administration continues to defend the program as a necessary tool for maintaining order and safety. DHS representatives maintain that partnerships with local police are crucial in targeting dangerous individuals who pose a threat to communities.
As the immigration debate continues, the efficacy and implications of the 287(g) program will likely remain subjects of significant scrutiny and contention, highlighting the fraught intersection between local law enforcement and federal immigration policy.
Source: Original Reporting
About The Author
