Check takers searching for to follow regulation in California skilled chaos this week because the State Bar of California fumbled the rollout of its new lawyer licensing take a look at, leaving many unable to finish their bar exams and a few submitting a proposed federal class motion lawsuit.
The web testing platforms repeatedly crashed earlier than some candidates even began. Others struggled to complete and save essays, skilled display lags and error messages and couldn’t copy and paste textual content from take a look at questions into the examination’s response discipline — a operate officers had acknowledged can be doable.
“It was fairly a debacle,” David Drelinger, a 2023 graduate of Lincoln Regulation College in Sacramento, informed The Instances.
After logging on remotely at round 9:45 a.m. Tuesday — quarter-hour forward of his 10 a.m. distant examination — Drelinger stated the testing platform crashed when a proctor logged on. He rebooted a number of instances, ultimately attempting three laptops and knocking on neighbors’ doorways to entry passwords to completely different web connections.
After 35 makes an attempt at logging on, he gave up.
“Right this moment was one of many worst days of my life,” Drelinger wrote in an e mail to the State Bar. “There have been a couple of factors that I assumed I used to be having a panic assault and nearly needed to name an ambulance as a result of I didn’t need to die alone at this time at my laptop.”
The brand new examination was promoted by the State Bar of California as a cost-cutting measure that may supply take a look at takers the selection of distant testing. However the deans of lots of California’s prime regulation colleges had flagged considerations to the State Bar and California Supreme Court docket for months within the run as much as the exams.
“It’s beautiful incompetence from an entity that exists to measure competence,” Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of the UC Berkeley College of Regulation, informed the Instances. “There’s no strategy to describe it apart from than outrageous and inexcusable. It is a take a look at that college students put together for months for, it determines whether or not or not they are often employed.”
On Friday, California Senate Judiciary Chair Thomas J. Umberg (D-Santa Ana) stated his committee would conduct an in depth examination and search an audit of the state bar by the California state auditor to totally perceive what went so “spectacularly flawed.”
“The failure of the State Bar in administering the February 2025 Bar Examination is unacceptable and unprecedented,” Umberg stated in a press release. “I’ll do all the things in my energy to make sure that this by no means occurs once more and that steps are taken to treatment this fiasco.”
Umberg stated the Senate will examine after a dozen deans of California Accredited Regulation Colleges despatched a letter Thursday to the California Supreme Court docket requesting it take “pressing steps” to handle the “tragic case of mismanagement” and “remediate the numerous hurt and harm” to check takers.
The deans requested that the Supreme Court docket take quite a lot of steps: instantly block a proposed March retake of the examination, provoke a course of for assessment and accountability, decide an equitable treatment, and publish a press release to reassure the general public that there’s applicable oversight going ahead.
Some college students additionally filed a criticism Thursday within the U.S. District Court docket for the Northern District of California, accusing Meazure Studying, the corporate that administered the examination, of “failing spectacularly” and inflicting an “unmitigated catastrophe.”
The proposed class motion doesn’t checklist the State Bar as a defendant — take a look at takers sometimes signal authorized waivers that restrict the company’s accountability for any laptop {hardware} or software program utility malfunction. But it surely alleges the regulatory company overseeing the state’s lawyer licensing and self-discipline “fast-tracked” the brand new examination format in a bid to save cash.
In an e mail to check takers Tuesday night time, the State Bar acknowledged that many had skilled “important” technical and customer support challenges.
“For that we’re actually sorry,” the bar’s Workplace of Admissions wrote. “These technical and assist points had been and are unacceptable. Making certain a good and dependable examination expertise is our prime precedence, and we’re actively evaluating subsequent steps.”
The State Bar informed candidates Tuesday it had deliberate, forward of the botched assessments this week, to let distant candidates who skilled technical issues retake the examination on March 3 and 4, however now it was additionally exploring extra treatments, similar to making scoring changes.
However on Thursday, the California State Bar rescheduled the retake exams to March 18 and 19 after, it claimed, some people had been attempting to stop the retake from being carried out by posting examination questions on-line.
“This conduct is strictly prohibited,” the State Bar stated in a press release, noting that they might interact forensic consultants to establish these accountable after which impose “strict sanctions.”
“People who’re discovered to have engaged in this sort of prohibited and unethical habits will discover it tough if not unimaginable to safe licensure with the State Bar of California.”
Over the previous couple of days, annoyed take a look at takers have logged on to Reddit and Fb message boards to complain concerning the examination’s rollout. Some stated the challenges they encountered prompted them bodily and psychological hurt after they’d taken break day work, paid for take a look at prep and made journey preparations.
Drelinger, a single father who has full custody of his 11-year-old son, stated he had lots using on passing the bar. He had accrued greater than $100,000 in pupil debt and hoped placing the examination behind him would enable him to enhance his life for his son and transfer out of their cramped one-bedroom condo.
“What actually stings is the time I’ve ignored my son to check for this take a look at solely to now have to inform him that it’s not over and gained’t be anytime quickly,” Drelinger wrote to the State Bar. “I’m undecided the place to go from right here.”
One other examination taker, who requested to stay nameless for worry of reprisal, stated he was exhausted and his head ached after experiencing a number of glitches Wednesday. The clock saved on ticking, he stated, as he sought assist from greater than 10 technicians. Ultimately, he had simply 10 minutes to finish his efficiency take a look at, a course of that’s presupposed to take 90 minutes.
“I really feel cheated,” he stated.
The examination, which consists of 5 one-hour essay questions, one 90-minute efficiency take a look at and 200 multiple-choice questions, is obtainable solely two weeks a 12 months — in February and in July. If the State Bar had been to permit him to retake the examination in March, he must take extra break day work — and he was not assured the issues can be fastened in only a few days.
“I don’t see any hope for the longer term,” he stated. “It’s only a cash seize. We’re paying for our proper to follow regulation and that may’t even be administered proper.”
Ceren Aytekin, a 2024 grasp of legal guidelines graduate of UC Berkeley, stated when she logged in at a middle in downtown Los Angeles to put in writing her first essay, her display saved freezing and he or she might solely kind 70% of the time.
When she complained throughout a lunch break, she was given a brand new laptop computer. However the lags grew to become worse: she might solely kind 50% of the time. Then, she obtained an error message notifying her that her reply wasn’t saved. An IT technician informed her to not fear.
“They informed me, ‘You guys hold complaining. What do you anticipate? There are going to be glitches and lags. There are 2,000 takers which might be utilizing the Meazure on the identical time.”
The following day, the director of the State Bar’s Workplace of Admissions allowed her to make use of her private laptop computer on the take a look at web site and he or she skilled few technical issues. However she remained involved about how the primary day’s issues impacted her rating.
“Nobody needs to retake the examination,” she stated. “That is torture.”
California has lengthy had one of many hardest bar exams within the nation: 54% of candidates handed in July 2024 and 34% of candidates handed in February 2024.
Final 12 months, because the State Bar of California confronted a $22.2-million deficit, it determined to interchange the take a look at questions developed by the Nationwide Convention of Bar Examiners’ Multistate Bar Examination, which doesn’t enable distant testing. It introduced a brand new $8.25-million five-year deal authorizing take a look at prep firm Kaplan Examination Providers to create multiple-choice, essays and efficiency take a look at questions.
The brand new examination, it projected, would save the bar as much as $3.8 million a 12 months.
However issues had been seen within the weeks earlier than the February debut as some take a look at takers struggled to schedule exams and had technical issues throughout mock exams.
“This new examination has not rolled out the way in which it ought to have, and we, the Board, apologize together with State Bar management and employees,” Brandon Stallings, chair of the State Bar Board of Trustees, stated in a Feb. 21 assertion. “The continued points with testing areas, scheduling, technical points, and communication lapses have distracted candidates from their research and created confusion.”
The board of trustees provided take a look at takers who withdrew from the February 2025 examination or failed the take a look at to retake the examination in July at no further price. About 1,066 of the 5,600 individuals who had registered for the February examination withdrew.
A lot of those that took the take a look at this week at the moment are demanding compensation for the litany of errors.
Some have known as for a refund. Others hope they modify the grading curve to permit a better proportion of take a look at takers to move the examination.
“This was an totally botched examination that fails each normal of professionalism,” one take a look at taker stated on Reddit. “All of us deserve a refund, move or fail, as a result of this fiasco is mainly a ******* breach of contract, AT MINIMUM. That is completely not what we paid for.”
Earlier than all of the exams had been over, some shared contacts for sophistication motion attorneys.
“In case your examination software program crashed whilst you had been taking the California State Bar, you could have a authorized declare for compensation,” one Washington, D.C., class motion agency stated in a publish shared on a Fb group for 2025 California bar takers. “Contact us now for extra details about your rights.”
“The place do you click on to enroll?” an nameless person requested.
Harshita Ganesh, an lawyer who practices regulation in Massachusetts and flew into L.A. for the take a look at as a result of her regulation agency needs her to additionally follow in California, stated she was interested by taking part in a category motion lawsuit.
“The incompetence has been astounding,” she stated, noting that her expertise taking the examination in California was utterly completely different to her expertise taking the equal examination final 12 months in Massachusetts.
She couldn’t copy and paste, the spotlight operate didn’t work more often than not and the software program lagged severely. The questions within the new take a look at, she stated, appeared nonsensical, as if written by synthetic intelligence.
“It’s not honest for the California bar to be charging us to be guinea pigs,” she stated.
Ellin Davtyan, State Bar common counsel, stated in a press release that the state bar understood some candidates is perhaps contemplating potential authorized treatments.
“That’s definitely inside their rights to take action,” she stated, “and the State Bar will consider and reply to the deserves of any such authorized claims and actions, as applicable.”
Edmond Aruffo, an adjunct professor at Thomas Jefferson College of Regulation in San Diego, who handed the California bar examination in 2020 whereas navigating his personal legal case and has since authored a number of California Bar Examination take a look at prep books, stated he had fielded emails and calls all week from upset college students.
“The quantity of stress individuals needed to undergo was incomparable to something I’ve ever seen in any examination,” Aruffo stated, noting that many might danger dropping their jobs in the event that they didn’t move.
However Aruffo stated there’s a steep hurdle for authorized claims: California sometimes makes those that take the State Bar examination signal authorized waivers. If take a look at takers might present fraud is concerned, that may remove any waiver. However Aruffo stated fraud has a really particular authorized definition.
“You would need to present that they purposefully misled individuals, understanding that they had been purposefully promoting them one thing that they weren’t going to ship,” Aruffo stated. “The Cal Bar can know that there are issues — and so they did know there have been issues as a result of they gave a mock examination — however that doesn’t imply that they purposely defrauded somebody.”
No matter occurred, Aruffo stated, he anticipated the board to supply some type of treatment — whether or not it’s letting take a look at takers take the examination in July at no cost or grading them solely on what they efficiently submitted.
“The bar examination breached their contract,” he stated. “They didn’t present a good examination to the scholars to take that may enable them to be licensed. I believe one thing needs to be carried out.”
About The Author
