A Los Angeles County jury says Starbucks is accountable for accidents of a buyer burned throughout a botched drive-through drink handoff — to the tune of $50 million.
L.A. resident Michael Garcia claimed that he was severely burned in 2020 after his tray of sizzling teas “caved in on itself,” he stated in a deposition. First one, then one other sizzling drink toppled onto his lap, their lids popping off. He suffered extreme burns, together with to his genitalia, he claimed.
Garcia accused Starbucks of negligence, and produced a retailer safety video that appeared to indicate that one of many Venti-sized drinks sat askew within the tray as a barista handed the order to him by way of a drive-through window.
Jurors on Friday agreed, and ordered the Seattle-based firm to pay Garcia $50 million for previous and future injury that embody ache and struggling.
Starbucks stated it plans to enchantment the decision.
“We sympathize with Mr. Garcia, however we disagree with the jury’s resolution that we had been at fault for this incident and imagine the damages awarded to be extreme,” Starbucks Director of Company Communications Jaci Anderson stated Saturday in a press release to The Instances. “We’ve at all times been dedicated to the best security requirements in our shops, together with the dealing with of sizzling drinks.”
The award harks again to civil courtroom judgments in opposition to McDonald’s after a jury in 1994 awarded $3 million to an Albuquerque girl who was scalded by sizzling espresso. Stella Liebeck, who was 79, suffered third-degree burns that required a number of pores and skin grafts. Her attorneys had argued McDonald’s had a historical past of a whole bunch of client harm complaints.
A decide later vastly diminished the award, however the McDonald’s case was often cited in campaigns for limits on tort awards.
Garcia’s attorneys didn’t reply instantly to a Instances request for remark however instructed one other information outlet that Starbucks carried some accountability for the actions of its barista, who in response to courtroom information stated she didn’t keep in mind the incident.
“This jury verdict is a important step in holding Starbucks accountable for flagrant disregard for buyer security and failure to just accept accountability,” one in all Garcia’s attorneys, Nick Rowley, was quoted as saying by the Related Press.
The incident described within the lawsuit occurred on Feb. 8, 2020, at a Starbucks drive-through in Exposition Park. Garcia, a then-25-year-old Postmates supply driver, was selecting up an order of three Venti sizzling teas. They had been served to him in a cardboard drink service.
Sooner or later in the course of the handoff, two of the teas fell from the service and spilled onto Garcia’s lap, leaving him with “horrific burn accidents that required a number of surgical procedures” and “everlasting disfigurement” to his groin area, in response to courtroom paperwork reviewed by The Instances. Medical information filed within the case present he underwent two pores and skin grafts and suffered lasting ache and sexual dysfunction.
Garcia blamed the spill on a barista, whom he claimed “didn’t securely fasten the lids of every sizzling beverage that had been negligently, carelessly and recklessly served to Plaintiff.” He testified that from the beginning he may see the lid on one of many drinks was not set in place.
Starbucks in its preliminary response argued that Garcia didn’t maintain “any harm, injury or loss by cause of any act or omission” by its staff, courtroom paperwork stated.
Through the trial, the corporate additional alleged some fault lay with Garcia on account of “contributory negligence,” the paperwork stated.
Earlier than the jury trial, Starbucks provided Garcia $3 million — and later $30 million — to settle, CBS Information reported.
Garcia agreed on the situation that the corporate apologize and alter its insurance policies, together with including a requirement that every one staff double-check that sizzling drinks are safe earlier than giving them to clients, the CBS report stated. Starbucks refused the phrases, and the case went to trial.
South Los Angeles resident Muriel Evans filed a comparable lawsuit in opposition to Starbucks in 2024, alleging she suffered important nerve injury and disfigurement after a barista mishandled a cup of espresso and spilled it in her lap. Attorneys within the case accused Starbucks of “reckless disregard” for buyer security by serving sizzling drinks in faulty cups “regardless of numerous stories and warnings.”
Evans’ jury trial is scheduled for February 2026.
About The Author
