All through the eight-plus months of US President Donald Trump’s second time period, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has boasted about how tightly coordinated the 2 world leaders are.
“President Trump and I are working in full cooperation and coordination,” he mentioned relating to the way forward for the Gaza conflict again in February.
Netanyahu sought to mission the identical optimism forward of his fourth White Home assembly with Trump this 12 months, as a result of happen Monday, telling Fox Information that his workplace was “working with President Trump’s crew” on the small print of the most recent US proposal to finish the Gaza conflict.
However despite Netanyahu’s makes an attempt to shift consideration away from any disagreements over ending the conflict and shifting into reconstruction, it’s not laborious to see that there are many gaps left to bridge.
Trump’s 21-point plan outlines a possible pathway to a future Palestinian state, one thing Netanyahu vocally rejects. “Giving the Palestinians a state one mile from Jerusalem after October 7 is like giving Al-Qaeda a state one mile from New York Metropolis after September 11,” Netanyahu mentioned throughout his UN speech. “That is sheer insanity. It’s insane, and we gained’t do it.”
He has additionally repeatedly rejected the Palestinian Authority having any function in governing postwar Gaza, whereas Trump sees a chance of a reformed PA serving to run the Strip.
Israelis attend a protest march in Jerusalem calling for an finish to the conflict and the discharge of hostages from Hamas captivity in Gaza, on September 27, 2025. (Chaim Goldberg/FLASH90)
The 2 leaders’ governments don’t see eye-to-eye on the thought of Israel annexing elements of the West Financial institution, both. Trump advised reporters on the White Home on Thursday, “I cannot permit Israel to annex the West Financial institution. I cannot permit it. It’s not going to occur.”
Netanyahu’s allies within the settler motion and on the far-right are calling publicly for him to disregard Trump and transfer forward with annexation, a basic precedence for them.
And in what may be probably the most evident indication that Netanyahu anticipates disagreements throughout Monday’s assembly, he belatedly cancelled his public appearances on Sunday to huddle with prime advisers in preparation for the White Home go to. It appears the prime minister discovered his lesson from his last-minute April journey to the Oval Workplace, during which he agreed to rush to Washington from Budapest, solely to find he had walked into a sequence of disagreeable surprises from Trump.
IDF forces function within the Gaza Strip on this September 28, 2025, handout. (IDF)
Netanyahu goes into Monday’s assembly in a susceptible place. He has put all his eggs within the Trump basket, and he’s much more depending on the president’s goodwill after a sequence of Western allies, corresponding to France and the UK, broke with Israel and acknowledged a Palestinian state final week.
On the identical time, if Netanyahu fails to persuade Trump to shift on key points — the longer term function of the PA in Gaza, a pathway towards a Palestinian state, annexation, facilitating the emigration of Gazans out of the Strip — he’ll face coalition companions on his proper flank who might determine that Netanyahu isn’t the person to ship on their priorities. With the following elections in Israel scheduled for October 2026 on the newest, they might select to exhibit their displeasure by breaking up Netanyahu’s coalition and triggering an early vote.
A manner out
Whereas he’s placing the Israeli chief in an uncomfortable place, Trump can be providing Netanyahu a manner out of the nook he has backed himself into. With out the Trump plan, it’s laborious to think about any finish to the conflict in Gaza within the foreseeable future.
As has been the case at quite a few junctures throughout the practically two-year conflict, the most recent IDF operation is placing stress on Hamas and racking up tactical successes. However there aren’t any indicators of an impending Hamas collapse and give up, which Netanyahu has repeatedly portrayed as one other step or two away, or of an imminent launch of the hostages the fear group is holding in Gaza.
Displaced Palestinians flee northern Gaza, by automobile and on foot, carrying their belongings alongside the coastal highway close to Wadi Gaza, September 26, 2025. (AP Photograph/Abdel Kareem Hana)
Netanyahu’s hand-picked IDF chief of workers, Eyal Zamir, doesn’t appear to be raring to crush Hamas on the battlefield. He has carried out all the things in his energy to move off and mitigate the Gaza Metropolis operation, telling the federal government that the offensive would flip right into a full-fledged occupation, and warning in a secret memo that the operation lacked a “political endgame” and risked the lives of each hostages and troopers.
But the plan that Zamir put ahead introduced its personal dangers. He needed the IDF to encompass Gaza Metropolis and cease there. Hamas wasn’t about to surrender the hostages as soon as it understood Israeli forces had stopped of their tracks, and his plan would have meant an prolonged siege in an space with tens or tons of of hundreds of civilians inside, letting much more worldwide ire construct up.
IDF Chief of Employees Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir speaks to an officer at Allenby Crossing, a day after a lethal assault, September 19, 2025. (Israel Protection Forces)
It’s not that Zamir was solely mistaken in his critique. With Netanyahu unwilling for political causes to put out a imaginative and prescient for a brand new authority in Gaza, and to begin placing that plan into place in territory the IDF controls, the Gaza Metropolis offensive isn’t set to deliver the struggle to a fast finish both. Even when the operation ends months down the highway, Israel will nonetheless have to maneuver to the central Gaza Strip. If it does so, there may be nonetheless no assure that taking the refugee camps there’ll pressure Hamas into give up.
So long as the conflict drags on, Israel can’t patch up its ties with Europe or suppose realistically about increasing the Abraham Accords, a serious precedence for Netanyahu in addition to Trump. Trump is giving Netanyahu a path towards releasing the hostages, disarming Hamas, and ending the conflict.
This handout image offered by the UAE Presidential Courtroom exhibits Emirati President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan (R) assembly with Syria’s interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa at Al-Shati palace on April 13, 2025. (Abdulla AL-BEDWAWI / UAE PRESIDENTIAL COURT / AFP)
If Netanyahu treats this second as a possibility, he can leverage it to again the PA into far-reaching reforms that Israel hasn’t compelled it to make for many years. He also can construct on the aid and the turning level unleashed by the top of the preventing in Gaza to catalyze establishing deeper ties with present Arab companions, and probably normalization with new ones.
The issue, nevertheless, is that for any of this to occur, a genocidal terrorist group has to agree that its time is up. That wasn’t seemingly within the first place, and is even much less seemingly now after leaders together with France’s Emmanuel Macron and the UK’s Keir Starmer handed Hamas a purpose to consider that holding out means extra achievements for Palestinians — corresponding to statehood recognition — and extra punishment for Israel.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, left, and French President Emmanuel Macron maintain a joint press convention in London, July 10, 2025. (Leon Neal/Pool Photograph through AP)
If Hamas finds excuses to successfully reject Trump’s proposal, though it can seemingly give obscure statements about welcoming it whereas providing fixes, the Western and Arab nations which have been demanding that the conflict finish must band collectively to clarify to Hamas leaders that there isn’t any victory awaiting the group, and that its leaders may as effectively save their pores and skin and throw within the towel.
Judging by the inconsistent and sometimes counterproductive conduct from these nations over the previous two years, it’s extra seemingly that they’ll react with muddled and indecisive diplomacy.
In the meantime, Israel will likely be left with a navy marketing campaign that may be described with comparable adjectives, and Netanyahu will likely be heading into an election someday within the subsequent 13 months with extraordinarily unsure prospects for returning to workplace.
About The Author
