Court halts Nexstar’s purchase of Tegna pending resolution of antitrust case

A federal judge has issued a ruling blocking the $6.2 billion merger between Nexstar Media Group and Tegna Inc., pending the resolution of an antitrust lawsuit. U.S. District Court Chief Judge Troy L. Nunley made the decision late Friday in Sacramento, California, attributing it to the likelihood of success for the case brought by eight state attorneys general and DirecTV.

### Details of the Merger

Initially announced last year and subsequently approved by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the proposed merger would have created a media entity controlling 265 television stations across 44 states and the District of Columbia. Most of these stations are local affiliates of major national networks, including ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC. However, the deal faced immediate scrutiny, with concerns raised about its implications for competition and local journalism.

Judge Nunley had issued a temporary restraining order blocking the merger for three weeks and conducted a hearing on April 7 to consider an extension of this block. The court’s deliberations focused on arguments from the plaintiffs, who claimed that the merger would lead to higher consumer prices and a decline in the quality of local news coverage.

### Concerns Over Competition

The plaintiffs, composed of Democratic attorneys general from various states along with DirecTV, contend that the merger violates federal antitrust laws aimed at preventing monopolistic behavior. They assert that consolidating numerous local television stations under a single corporate entity could severely harm competition.

Following the ruling, New York Attorney General Letitia James stated, “Consolidating hundreds of local TV stations under one corporate owner would mean higher prices and lower quality programming for consumers. Nexstar’s merger with Tegna illegally eliminates competition, and today we won a critical victory in our effort to enforce the law and stop this merger from moving forward.”

### Nexstar’s Response

In response to the ruling, Nexstar expressed its intention to appeal. The company emphasized that the merger had already received the necessary regulatory approvals from the FCC and the U.S. Department of Justice. Nexstar’s representatives argued that the deal would bolster local journalism rather than diminish it.

“Nexstar Media Group now owns TEGNA and has taken steps consistent with the Court order that has been in effect,” the company stated in a release. Furthermore, Nexstar’s attorneys noted that the merger required the approval of the Republican-led FCC, which had previously indicated its support under certain conditions, including the divestiture of six television stations.

### FCC Approval and Regulatory Oversight

The FCC’s approval of the merger was contingent upon the agency waiving regulations that typically limit the number of local stations a single company can own. In March, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr indicated that Nexstar had committed to measures aimed at maintaining robust local content. However, critics argue that such assurances are insufficient to mitigate the potential consequences of the merger.

During the hearings, Judge Nunley recognized the significant market influence that the merger could generate. He noted that Nexstar would gain ownership of two or even three major local affiliates in 31 television markets. As a result, the judge warned that multichannel video programming distributors, including DirecTV, might be compelled to comply with Nexstar’s pricing demands, thereby raising costs for consumers.

### Next Steps

The case will now proceed through the legal system as the antitrust lawsuit unfolds. Nexstar’s appeal aims to reverse the ruling and allow the merger to advance, while the plaintiffs remain steadfast in their commitment to challenge the deal on competition grounds. The outcome of this case is likely to have implications not only for the companies involved but also for the broader landscape of local television broadcasting.

As this high-stakes legal battle continues, the impact on consumers, local journalism, and the television industry at large remains to be seen.

Source: Original Reporting

About The Author

Spread the love

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Share via
Copy link